How to Negotiate Salary

InsightsSarah_NegotiatingSalary
Tips from Career Coach Sarah Weinberger on negotiating a better salary.

In order to emerge from the interviewing process a winner and reach your earning potential, you must be prepared to do homework and work.

First of all, do not discuss salary. The employer should want you. Discuss what you can do for them and how you are valuable to them. The reason that an employer asks you salary information is they want to know how little they can pay you. They do not want to quote a price higher than what you currently make. They know very well the price range for the position. The other reason often cited by employers is that they want to know if the candidate is in their price range. Everyone has enough money for the right person. They also know the salary range for the position at hand. They can do the math of the seniority of that person and their expertise in the area.

The amount on the offer letter is a reflection of how much they feel that you are worth to them. The first number, the starting point, says a lot. A company that is truly interested in you for the long-term will pay, so that they snap you up. If they want to negotiate and go into haggling, the bargaining can work against the candidate in the future, because even if they pay, they might feel that they are overpaying and build resentment, even subconsciously. If not, it can show that they are cheap and into playing games.

I once received an offer letter from a company and they gave me a low-ball figure with the statement that the amount is final. The salary offered was a very, very lowball figure, below that of even a starting engineer, let alone a senior software and systems engineer. I turned it down. The employer came back with the statement that the hiring manager talked to the CEO and they went over their finances and were able to get a few more dollars. The offer was still low. This game went on for three rounds, and in the end, I turned down the offer. I knew what I was worth. A couple of weeks later, I started work at a different company, a bit further, but several times that earlier offer. A candidate must do research and know how much they are worth. A candidate should know what they are wroth in perks too and how that compares to others (for instance a private office, dedicated parking spot, extra time off, flex time, etc.).

During the interview be sure to listen to what the interviewers say about the position, not just the text posted in the requisition. Go home and do your homework on how you fit the extra points not mentioned. Be sure to write down concrete facts. Keep this information for the following conversation after you receive an offer letter. When the negotiating time comes, you want to call out everything that you bring to the table, not just the specific points raised in the requisition. You want to show them concretely what you can do for them that they may not have realized.

Never say yes or no immediately. Ask to wait a week or so to give yourself a chance to cool off and do research, not just on all the additional tasks required for the position, but doing research for salary ranges in your area for similar position.

Request a follow-up meeting to discuss the offer letter. Never highball, as that is a turn off, but if you feel and know that you are worth more, say so and then cite the facts getting down to business. You may want to remember that time is money, so if they balk at money, maybe you can get something in kind, extra vacation or whatever. The reason that I say “time is money,” is because there is also the reality that the longer that you do not work, the more money flies out the window. If you turn down a salary for $500 per year, but will be out of work for one-month, you may lose more in the longer term than what you might gain. When negotiating, you must keep immediate, short, and long-term goals and benefits in mind.

When you go into negotiate, first start off with a soft question, one that does not mean anything, something that you already know the answer to, such as when you can get a 401K match. The answer, as you can easily research, is always 6-months. The second question should be another easy question. The third question should be your top priority. Have your priorities written out before you come into negotiate the salary.

All employers expect that candidates to negotiate. That is part of the process. In fact, employers see candidates who negotiate as high performers, who value themselves. That might be another reason for them to give you a lower salary to start. They want to know if you value yourself.

Do remind the hiring manager all that you bring to the table and why you are the expert that can solve their problem and take responsibility for solving their problem.

Saying no and declining the offer letter is also an option. Show that you are definitely interested in the position, both through expression and in deed, but if you are worth more, then say so and turn it down. I know from personal experience back in 2005 that an employer much of the time for a right fit will come back. I had this one employer come back to me with two additional offers. Be prepared to walk. Never sell yourself short, as that is a recipe disaster.

Do not get discouraged by comments like: “We are happy that you would like to work with us, however the salary that we budgeted (the key word here) for this position is what we offered.” Know when to not back down and stand firm, but also know when to negotiate or get something in kind. Do your homework ahead of time.

Lastly, practice speaking and talking. Winning friends and influencing people, is an art and not a skill that one comes by through birth.

  • Do your homework
  • All salaries and benefits are negotiable
  • Make a counter offer (might include little or no extra money but add benefits)
  • Make a positive impression and iterate how you can solve their problem
  • Explain how you help their bottom line, but do not make this a discussion of you and how you are perfect and the best
  • If you want to grow and do more as you get familiar with things, mention that
  • Always be courteous, respectful, kind, and good-natured

Please do the following, if you enjoyed/benefited from this article.

  • Share it with others on social media
  • Like this article
  • Like my page: Facebook.com/AspirationCoach

Sarah Weinberger is a professional career coach, software and systems engineer, and founder and CEO of Butterflyvista Corporation. You can learn more about her and Butterflyvista by visiting the website, http://www.butterflyvista.com/.

Restarting career after extended break

Employers like candidates, who are employed, naturally, but that can be a bad thing too, if too long at one employer or skills at that employer are dated.

What matters most is practical skills. A candidate reentering the job market must first assess if their skill set is still what employers want and relevant / current.

A good way to get practical experience is simply to do some volunteer work or internship. Getting a current certification in your area is another great way to show relevance and explain time off. Many employers give skill evaluation tests, so that many times takes the place of experience. If going the volunteer route, there are many non-profits. Advertising on Craig’s List is a surefire way to do that. You only need a few months, but I think simply going the education route is best. One should never work for free.

Candidates should talk to recruiters and employers and see what the complaints are, if any. A candidate should not assume thoughts from others. They should get feedback. The candidate should not give excuses, simply state the reason. After receiving a list of complaints, the candidate can categorize them and start strategizing a list of action items to address each point. Negative comments are great, better than positive ones, as they lead to correction and improvement.

Sarah

Sarah Weinberger is a career coach with Butterflyvista Corporation. She is also a software and systems engineer. You can learn more about her and Butterflyvista by visiting the consulting website, http://consulting.butterflyvista.com/. You can connect with her via the site or her LinkedIn profile.

How to Properly Do a Job Interview

A scene showing a job candidate interviewing for a job.
Tips from Career Coach Sarah Weinberger on interviewing techniques.

The standard approach to an interview is to just show up and roll with the flow. Some people might rehearse possible questions, but that is usually as far as it goes. In this article, I will talk about the proper way to prepare for and handle an interview.

Before going into details, let us step back and think of something familiar. Think of a stand-up comedian, famous or not. Comedians come in all forms and with all different types of dialogue. Here is what all comedians have in common. They all get an audience that is relatively unknown. They must dynamically assess whether they have or lost their audience. They have to not only build a relationship with the audience, but they have to win them over. They have to prepare, know their material, dress appropriately, and most importantly tell a story. All people are conditioned from childhood to love stories. Being able to read nuances is critical, because once you lost your audience, then the game is over.

Another way to phrase the concept of telling a story is to paint a picture. In an interview setting, the employer does not want to hear long drawn out tales with irrelevant information. They want short, clear, and concise answers to their questions. All questions drive to one point, to help them gauge whether or not the interviewee is the best candidate to solve their problem. The interviewee must paint the picture, much like a comedian, that they are the best person. They must win over their audience.

The Hopefully Obvious

The first rule is always dress to impress. Older job seekers tend to learn this lesson, but the younger set, those graduating from college or still in college, do not always follow this rule choosing many times go in school / street clothes. When questioned, the response usually comes back that they asked their parents how to dress and the parents told them that they are students, obviously students, and should dress as such. Many times that includes athletic shoes, flip flops, or sandals. These shoes and clothes are never appropriate. You have to impress upon the perspective employer that you are serious, mean business, and have a desire to impress them in a good way.

Do not chew gum or go with lose papers. Spit out your gum before meeting anyone. Have some sort of professional looking case. I do not want to say briefcase, but something that looks sharp. Turn off your cell phone and other electronic gadgets that can distract you or make noise.

The Preparation

Do research on the company prior to going there and research the position a bit, more so than what the requisition says. You may want to research the hiring group and see what the product(s) the group, with whom you will interview, produces. Determine the real expertise needed. Most often the manager, who wrote the requisition, is not technical and may not realize all aspects of the task.

See how you fit that position. Live that position in your mind. See how all your skills fit that position. Find your strengths and weaknesses. Address any weaknesses at this stage. You may want to create your own modified requisition that includes additional information that you should mention that you have, which are relevant.

Create a list of questions that you want to ask. It does not matter that you know, or think you know, all the answers. You want to show the employer that you are interested in the position and that you did your homework.

Get the names ahead of time of all the individuals with whom you will meet. Look them up on social media. See what are their likes, dislikes, passions, experience, and everything else. Do for them what they will do for you. If you see that one plays a killer saxophone and loves Jazz, while you play the drums and love Jazz just as much, then you have something in common with which to “break the ice,” and show that you are not such an unknown. Connect with them on social media. That shows that you are serious about the position and gives you a few minutes extra attention.

You must show that you did your homework and are on top of all the facts.

The Resume

Resumes at most initially get about a 30-second read, where the person reads experience, any summary, and job titles. If the experience and skillset bullets are not verbose, those will get glanced at. Prior to an interview, the interviewer will again briefly look at the resume.

Have several copies each of two different versions of your resume handy, one that shows a summary of your skills that someone can understand by glancing at the document, and the other should be a more detailed version that addresses the questions that you think the employer might ask. You should also have a copy of the resume that you already sent the employer.

Every part of every resume needs to answer the question: “Why are you the best to solve my specific problem?” Employers are not interested in information perceived to be irrelevant to their requisition. It is the job of the interviewee to specifically state why any information that can be construed as not directly related applies.

The Lies

If you do not know something, do not lie. Simply say that you do not know, but can easily find out, or state a possible answer and then add that you are not sure, but the answer was an educated guess.

An Omission is also a lie by another name. The employer will try and read you. If they sense that something is off or that you hide something, be it professionally or personally, which they feel might affect your work, they will assume the worst. More likely, they will disqualify you because of that and pass on you. Employers want individuals that they can trust.

You are a stranger and initially are an unknown. That is why many hires come by way of recommendations from existing employees or friends. That bridges the unknown by one step. That obviously does not say that the person is good, but that is hiring psychology at work. Being honest and upfront goes a long way towards instilling trust.

By asking you in, he/she assumes that you already know the material. You have to prove him/her wrong on that. The employer also must determine if you are genuine, he/she can trust you, and if you are a team player.

The Fun Stuff

You may want to bring some sort of show and tell to show your skills. You should have some sort of portfolio that shows whom you are, what you did, and what you can do for them. Be creative and have fun on this part.

Do not blab on and on. Try and keep the conversation precise but friendly. Some small talk is always nice. You should look around and see your environment. Be aware of your surroundings and cognizant of your earlier research. Do you see a model of the Star Ship Enterprise or the Death Star? A small conversation at the end on something different could liven up the mood and put a smile on the interviewer. You want to see if you have anything, where the two of you can bond.

The End

You should always write down the interview afterwards jotting down everything that was asked and answered. If you were given any test, then you should write down the questions. Review what was said and the answers that you gave. This information will come in handy for the next interview.

The interview is not done, when you walk out the door. Write everyone back an email later on that day and thank them for interviewing you. Do send out a snail mail physical thank you card. Remind them in each case the highlights why you are the best and address any negatives in a positive manner.

Lastly, believe, think, and say that you want the job. If you do not really want the job, then move on. Going into a position that will make you unhappy, can only prolong your suffering.

Please do the following, if you enjoyed/benefited from this article.

  • Share it with others on social media
  • Like this article
  • Like my page: Facebook.com/AspirationCoach

Sarah Weinberger is a professional career coach, software and systems engineer, and founder and CEO of Butterflyvista Corporation. You can learn more about her and Butterflyvista by visiting the website, http://www.butterflyvista.com/.

Searching for a job in an ever changing world

I have noticed over the years all the changes. Changes take all forms.  Star Trek went from a very crude television series in the 1960s to quite a marvel in the latest Star Trek: Into Darkness complete with Imax and 3D, although I only saw the 3D, not the Imax.  In the 1960s, there was no such thing as a smartphone.  Star Trek introduced a flip top communicator as a huge thing never to happen in our lifetimes.  Well, flip top cell phones came and went and we now have smartphones.  We have touch screen 3D monitors, and a buggy Windows Phone 8 that does not allow email access.  Okay, some things are the same, namely buggy stuff.

There is another thing that has not changed over the years.  I have seen that over, and over again, even in my own family.  What is that?  The way we look for a job.  Most people do not look for a job properly.  They may yell, get violent, huff, puff, and threaten to blow a house down, but the plural vast majority of people have no clue how to find a job.

Thankfully, I got lucky.  I had someone teach me years ago now.  Before going further, see if the following applies to you.  You ask a few friends and/or family members if they know of a job.  This approach got a bit more sophisticated with LinkedIn and Facebook.  You collect millions upon zillions of friends.  (I highly recommend that each person on this planet who subscribes to Facebook, Twitter, and/or LinkedIn be forced to watch and study The Great Gatsby.  Okay, the first half hour to hour was super boring, but the ending was quite riveting and had a lesson to teach.)  Of those millions upon millions of friends, if you have one real friend, then consider yourself lucky.  I could right an entire novel on what I think of Facebook, but I am off topic.  Okay, people buy a book and read, much better use of time.

People ask a few friends, they maybe go to a job board or two and respond to a few job postings, and talk to your favorite recruiter, who contrary to popular belief does not have your interest at heart and does not work for you, no matter what they say.  Recruiters work for employers and have the employer’s interest at heart.  Period.  Dealing with a recruiter is like playing Power Ball or whatever favorite idiocy name is applied to the get money from poor people fad, otherwise known as the lottery.  In total people might send out somewhere in the neighborhood of twenty resumes every couple of weeks, maybe a month.

When the method just described does not work, people get demoralized and say that there are no jobs.  During the recession there were reduced jobs, but there were still jobs.  Even the good times met with hard times for obtaining work.  There is no such thing as hanging your shingle on the door, Little House style, and you will see people come knocking with a town behind you to give you business and the modern day equivalent to chickens paid in kind.

No matter what changes in life, searching for a job does not.  I know.  Jobfish provides a prism to the way in which people look for a job.  Yes, by looking at the areas that people use, but much more importantly by the support calls and talking with individuals.  Even ones that feel liberal in sending in support tickets, many of them still do not look for work properly.

Oprah a few years back (have your grandmother explain who Oprah is/was) had a few episodes, which got picked up by the multitude of media even Newsweek (ask your Great Grand Father on that one), where she talked of “The Secret”.  If there ever was a product that shows that someone can get rich of selling ice to Eskimos in Alaska, it is that product.  I still could not sit through the entire DVD without falling asleep.  Okay, it does have that redeeming quality.  It is better than a book or music.  The DVD stated that if you think positive that you will get what you want.  If you do not get what you want, then that is because you had a stray thought.  Basically, you are not pure Vulcan.  Spock would fail.

Success comes to those that try and do not give up.  Those that do not take no for an answer are likely to succeed.  If everyone will say that you are a failure, but you keep chipping away at the goal, you will one day succeed.  There are those that wake up at 8:00 AM in the morning, screw off half the day, and go to bed early, and say they are working.  There are those that go to bed at a reasonable time and wake up at the crack of dawn and work their asses off.  When I say “work their assess off”, I do mean smartly, not stupidly.  Work hard yes, but smartly too.  You have to analyze mistakes and judge comments from others judicially perusing the point and regardless of the source and judging if the point has merit.

Before going on, here is another pet peeve of mine that I hear from others.  Sorry, but although some males exhibit this behavior, by and large it applies to women, at least from my observation.  Yes, there is Hillary, Martha, and others are counterweights, but they are still the exception.  Many people say that they are not smart enough to do something.  They do not have the skill to do something.  They are not this and not that.  You here every excuse in the book.  You really want to shake these people.  Maybe some shaking would scramble some neurons in the brain properly and straighten out the thinking.  Southern California has Magic Mountain.  These individuals should go there.

One learns by doing.  Believe in yourself and the rest follows.  Do not judge yourself.  That is a job for others.  Your job when looking for a job is to cast as wide a net as possible and be the little engine that could.  (That was a great childhood story.  Loved it.)  That is a better example.  A little train that thinks he can, can do more than a big noisy train that thinks he cannot.  The relevance is there, if you interpret the story the right way.  (Perchik from Fiddler on the Roof would smile at this statement.)

I hear people say that they do not really want to do this or that.  A better comment would be do you really want to spend several years out of work and wasting your life and watching your family blow away?  I am not saying to settle.  That is another problem.  Working in a hotel kitchen is fine, but if you could do more, then do not settle because you think of yourself as a failure.  You rob society, g-d, and yourself by doing so.  Okay, I sound like Gene Roddenberry here, but hey, why not.

A person who sends out 500 resumes each and every week, talks to a hundred different companies and people each week, and does a slew of other things inclusive of learning and studying is more likely to land a job than the one that talks your ear off on why they cannot do something.  There is a difference between really trying and not succeeding and needing a hand up and out and talking the talk, but not walking the walk.

The hardest part is to get started and to know that the journey will be long, but that patience will in the long run pay off.  Yes, I am the choir to the statement that I was born without patience, that I fell asleep at the park, when nature / g-d chimed for all to get in line to collect patience.  I would not even know what that is.  Like I said, I feel asleep.  Ditto for faith.  That does not mean that I do not know that things take time and hard work.  Let just say that I did not just fall off the turnip truck.  That possibly happened last week. 😉  I am not knocking turnips.  A relative of mine, when I was young grew turnips in the backyard and prepared all sorts of things with the vegetable.  You have to take a deep breath, and start by putting the first foot in front and saying that the journey should begin.  Please, do not wait until January 1st.

I offer an example.  I always prided myself on healthy eating and at little to no sweets.  I was roughly 38″ around my middle for years.  For about a year, people, one in particular, kept after me that I look funny that there is nothing up there by a whole lot down there.  I was asleep or something.  One day, I measured myself and saw that I got to 42.25″ and was well over 200lb.  That was last July.  I got me a personal trainer, as I knew that beside everything else that I would not workout properly on my own.  I am way too lazy.  I admitted that.  It was the truth, so nothing to be ashamed at.  I told my trainer the facts and the first session had measurements and conversation.  Next Monday is Memorial Day 2013, so just about a year and a year of much hard work.  I am not back at 35″ yet (my healthy waist measurement, which corresponds to 160lb to 165lb or so).  I measured myself yesterday at 38.25 inches and 178lb.  I have a long way to go, but I already came a long way.  I lost four inches and about 25 to 30lbs.

Why did I bore you here?  The reason is that success comes through hard work.  Good is bad, and bad is good, except when good is good and bad is bad.  The trick is to know the difference.  Bread and sugar is bad, even though you temporarily think of it as good, but what really is good and bad?  Is being 215lb good and suffering walking up the stairs just to enjoy a pizza or is being healthy and fit good and forgoing the pizza?

Am I off topic?  Nope.  I would not even begin to debate that I have patience or know about faith.  I freely admit that I lack the two.  As I said, I was asleep at the park underneath a tree or something, when nature / g-d passed out patience and faith.  I do know the benefit of hard and continuous work.  I never said that I was on a diet.  That is such a stupid word.  Diet implies going back to old ways when you reach your goal.  That means a yoyo effect, as the old ways caused the problem in the first place.  Think of adjusting oneself as a lifestyle change.  Eat vegetable soup, not potato cheese or broccoli cheese soups.  Did you know that a bowl of good split pea soup is 490 calories but a bowl of vegetable soup (no potato or other trash) is 90 calories?

Landing a job requires being 100%, not 50%.  You have to have a realistic assessment of where you are and what you need to do, and then start checking off one item at a time over a prolonged period of time.  Landing a job requires putting in the time, much like losing weight.  What you think of as bad is actually good.  When it came to my weight, I had someone nagging me and pointing out the facts until I saw them on my own.  Searching for a job is no different.

Jobfish can help.  Butterflyvista designed Jobfish with the job seeker in mind.  We as a company have collective stories of what it is like.  Yes, we have experience on both ends, recruitment as well.  Still, Jobfish can help and not just because we designed the program, but because it can.

You have to talk with many different recruiters and keep logs and schedule and keep track of callbacks.  There is no such thing as your favorite recruiter.  Use all recruiters, 100 per day, each day new, each and every day.  At the same time, broaden your skill set.  Think of yourself as major awesomeness.  Be the expert, even if you are not.  Nobody is.  People who say they are experts just talk that way.  Yes, some have real facts, but a lot of it is attitude.  Do not say trash and stupid things.  That is where studying comes in and doing due diligence.

Send out 50 to 100 resumes each and every day, Sundays inclusive.  Keep different versions of your resume.  If a recruiter says that they need something in a particular format, say no worries.  Hang up.  Scream or yell, curse at the recruiter, but then give the recruiter what they need.  They know what the hiring manager and HR department will need and what they do not want to see.

Also, if you have a father that says that you can wear athletic shoes to an interview because you are a college graduate, you have my permission to disregard the person and read books on the topic.  One must always dress to impress.  Guys, that means that you can and should get a manicure and have your hair done.  Looking clean cut and groomed always helps.  Please know a tailor and a dry cleaner.  Clothes should fit and be clean and pressed.  No exceptions.

Get a life coach.  It takes a real person to know that you cannot do it alone.  There is no bravery for going it alone.  Hillary once wrote that it takes a village to raise a child.  That is true.  Jobfish is not your entire village, nor meant to be, but it is a powerful tool that can help.  We are here to help.

Check out Jobfish at our website at www.butterflyvista.com or www.jobfish.com.

The Dichotomy of a City and its Job Market

I was going through old articles that I had saved from several years back and one of them from six years ago asked if outsourcing and H1-B visas were getting rid of America’s technical edge and eroding our middle class. I would say that the prediction came true, but things are more nuanced.

Definitely, going to any mall, at least here in Southern California yields a plethora of malls that are brimming with people and sales. Here in Santa Monica, restaurants catering to the middle class are not very popular as seen by the closing of Sizzlers. One can argue that people cannot afford to go out, so no big surprise, but the two eateries that replaced Sizzler is doing a phenomenal amount of business and charging a lot more.

Take another example, the Santa Monica Place, the main mall here in the city. The mall just reopened after a two-year renovation. The mall prior to closing had a Broadway and a Robinson’s May as anchor stores. The mall also had a roof. What changed in two years? The roof went away, which absolutely baffles me why people want to shop with radiation, when they have the Third Street Promenade next door and the beach. More to keeping on track, the two middle class stores were replaced by a Nordstrom’s and a Bloomingdale’s. There is a gourmet high end market on the third floor. From what I hear, the mall’s focus, like most everything else in Santa Monica caters to not the top 2%, but I would argue the top 0.1%. Driving down Montana Avenue, or most any other street here, yields one high end store after the other.

Did you know that a few years ago, there was a JC Penney? That store became a ‘Banana Republic,’ a high end Gap. The list of changes goes on. One can argue that Santa Monica is unique here in Southern California, but no.

One can probably argue that the rich get richer and the poor poorer, but I would disagree with that statement too. Definitely careers have a lot to do with things, and maybe there lies the answer. Professions that cannot be outsourced or do not have H1-B visas have a large and healthy middle class. Fields that are protected are another source of middle class. People here on H1-B are also middle class.

The people, who were affected, just do not shop or radically reduced. Okay, that is hard to fathom as well, if one looks at lines at movie theaters. AMC Theaters is now becoming so cocky that they got rid of the AMC Movie Watcher program and replaced it with AMC Stubs, which a program designed to be better. I agree. The question is better for whom. The answer is them. Six dollar per year fee, a huge decrease in benefits, and elimination of popcorn on Wednesdays definitely says that there business has not suffered, but is in fact booming. If lines, upgrades, and ticket prices have anything to do with sales, then they are doing one heck of a job. Yes, that is a quote from a few years ago, not that it was intentional.

I would say that if we take Southern California as a judge, the United States is not only away from the recession and the worst of times, but we are in the best of times, and far more so than Samuel Clemons knew in his day.

So how do these facts jive with 12.4% unemployment here in the Southland, which translates to upwards of 20% unemployment, as the labor statistics only report those people who collect unemployment insurance or go down to certain career centers and report themselves as a statistic? By the way, is there anyone that has done that or even knows how to do that, let alone has the time? Before going on, California has a huge deficit, 25 billion dollars. That also correlates to 20% unemployment plus probably another 10% underemployment. There is less money coming in, so less people pay taxes.

That must mean that either the rest of the population got huge raises and/or there has been an influx of rich people here to the Southland. Before anyone says that the Southern California is special, it is not. The rest of the nation says the same thing. Does the 30% of the population that is suffering live in a bubble? A percentage less than that toppled the Egyptian regime. At a minimum, there should be protests, but there are none.

It is hard to argue that America is losing its technical edge, considering how well America’s top firms keep doing, although I did read about an Indian company that created a drug, and is doing well. Russia and the Chinese are the two countries in manned space flight. The United States is retiring from that given the cancelation of the Shuttle, Constellation, and Venture Star programs. I am still upset about the Venture Star programming getting the ax years ago, but happy about the Constellation programming getting the ax. Did you all read/hear that William Shatner gave a wakeup call to the astronauts of Discovery today?

Maybe the lesson we wind up with is a tale of two cities, where one is quiet and the other so far not so quiet. The quiet ones do have it in their power to rise up and do something about it. We all do. Egypt has shown that. No, I am not talking of a revolution. Okay, I am, but not the overthrowing kind, but rather the Oprah kind, where we change tactics and do not rely on methods of old. There are jobs out there. We just have to get them.

That is where Jobfish comes in. If you are searching for a job the old fashioned way, then you do yourself a disservice. You really are. Just as we would work hard and organized for an employer, there is no reason to be sloppy and nonchalant about a job search. One should be more organized and methodical in a job search, then when working for someone else. We as Americans have to not take no for an answer, but rather say, and mean, yes we can. It is up to us. Jobfish is the first step towards that end. Be the one that shops at Nordstrom’s. If you shop there, then you might know of someone who does not, so help them out and turn them on to the tools that can help.

As a closing remark, the new build of Jobfish does away with support of Hot Jobs. That is because, as you probably heard, that Monster bought the job board from Yahoo and merged the site theirs. Hot Jobs no longer exists. Which one had the cold jobs?

Let me know your thoughts.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

http://www.jobfish.com http://blog.jobfish.com

Butterflyvista is the maker of Jobfish 2010, a job search program to help the job seeker find a job. Just as the iPhone revolutionized the smartphone market, Jobfish 2010 is revolutionizing the job search market. From help with your resumes, to working with the job boards, such as Craig’s List, applying for jobs, and so much more, Jobfish 2010 relieves the burdens of the mundane stuff, which usually frustrates job seekers beyond belief. Knowledge and organization is power, and Jobfish gives you both.

Surviving a Prolonged Economic Downturn

Many people are facing dire times during a prolonged economic downturn, which started by and large in late 2007, although depending upon your specialty, the beginnings of the recession started in the ‘80s with the outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs to other countries.  It was just a matter of time before white collar work got outsourced too.  The politics of the situation, though, do not change the reality for many people.  With bills to pay and many people out of work for two years or more with no unemployment benefits, philosophical discussions are a moot issue.  Solving the problem is tantamount.  For some, joining the military is an option, especially if you are younger, but for others that is not an option.

Although I cannot promise anyone a sure fire way that guarantees a job, I can tell you how to what the best strategies are, which will place you in the best possible position, so that you can get one of the few jobs, which are available.  You do not have to work hard, but you do have to put in time and be smart.  Okay, so let us begin.

The first thing that you should do is to discard old beliefs.  Sending out five or so targeted resumes that you research and know that you are qualified for every couple of weeks does not cut the mustard anymore, so to speak.  What you think of your qualifications is not as important as what the employer and recruiter thinks of your qualifications.  Apply to anything and everything within plausibility of your field.  You do not need to read the job descriptions.  You only need to glance at it quickly.  Your motto should be to throw enough things against the wall, so that not only will something stick, namely that you get an interview, but that you get hired too.  You need to make a nuisance of yourself.  Be heard.  You should send out several hundred resumes every other day.  In a month time period, you should have sent out several thousand.  Yes, you can do that and not spend more than a couple hours a day on the activity.  I will tell you how later in this article.

In most jobs, one does a varied number of things.  For instance, many people in white collar jobs have to do a bit of project management, even if you are not the project manager (PM).  Maybe you had to train people.  Did you ever have to write something?  What I am driving after is that you should explore working in a related field.  It does not matter what you think of your skills, but what the hiring manager thinks.  I say hiring manager, because you can work around recruiters.  They are two dimensional in nature, as are human resource managers.  By the way, being a human resource manager is another possibility.

Create one resume for each type of work.  Mention every job that you had, but emphasize skills in the area that you want to push.  Try to recollect back to your time and think if you did anything in that field, if even scarcely.  If you did, play that up.  Do a search on job boards and find industry buzzwords in the field.  Research what they mean.  You can do that by doing a Google search.  Add those buzzwords, which you feel comfortable.  Maybe you can study a bit those buzzwords and do some practice exercises with them, so that you know the lingo.

When the going gets tough, the tough should start working smartly and aggressively.  Craft one cover letter for each job type. Be willing to accept a small decrease in pay, if you get into high-paying field for which you really do not have that many skills.  You will be receiving remuneration for advancing your skillset and getting into a new line of work.  Be happy.  I did not say to sell yourself short.  You should never do that.

When the topic of distance comes up, act like you have been to that location a zillion times.  The answer should always be that the distance is not bad and that you can do that easily.  What difference is it to anyone what the actual time is?  You are not being paid for it, so why discuss that you will be on the road for an hour.   Be firm and reassuring that the distance is not bad and that you are experienced.

Work every job board and be prepared to talk with recruiters and human resource personnel when they call.  Never, and I do mean NEVER, discuss your job search and how it is going with anyone.  It is not their business.  When a recruiter asks if you have any pending interviews, be firm that you do not discuss your job search.  Act like a manager and the one that is in charge.  Take control of the conversation.  That includes finding out what the job position is.  Most recruiter will not initially give out this information, as they want to screen you to see if you have the skillset.  They may ask you to describe your ideal job.  Try to avoid getting angry or agitated. That only hurts you. Obviously, the answer is any job that pays and is close to home, but you cannot say that, sadly. Tell them what they want to hear. You must tell them that you want to work in that field for which they are calling.  How can you do that?   You do that by keeping track of which jobs you applied to and having the information at your fingertips indexed by company name and contact person.  If someone is calling you, more than likely it is because you applied for the job.

I will give you a word of advice.  Be very cautious about giving out your social security number and other key pieces of information.  You do not need to fill that out on an initial interview.  If it becomes serious, then provide it.  If a company requests it for tracking purposes, such as with Bank of America, I would think twice.  Companies like Bank of America do not care about you.  They could care less.  It is up to you to protect your own interests, just as they do their own.  I would think twice about applying for those types of jobs.  Maybe you want to if the situation is desperate enough, but I would still error on the side of caution.

Searching for a job effectively today cannot be done the old fashioned way.  Employers and recruiters have tools to help them, you should as well.  More than likely you have either a computer or a laptop. It is time that you get a software program which will help you do the chores related to finding a job. When checking into a software tool, your software tool should allow you to apply for jobs without opening a million tabs. It should assist you with your with resumes and a host of other things.

Be careful to not get flustered and throw up your hands doing a job search. Let us look at a common situation, where this happens. Remember, people will only see the end result, the final email, not all the hard work that went into applying for a job. Job boards are the most notorious, as far as being a pain in the rear.  Even so called simple boards, like Craig’s List, are a pain to use.  Take Craig’s List, in order to apply for a job, you must navigate to a job category and then open up jobs of interest on a separate tab.  You then have to open up a new blank email form, one for each job, and then fill out each piece of information that goes into an email, one by one. You can easily spend ten minutes to send out one resume.  The work does not end there, as you should keep track of this application, so that you can add information later on and retrieve information later on too. Yes, this part of the job search process is the most tedious and the most dreadful.

Be careful to not feel humiliated dealing with job boards, endlessly rewriting resumes, and especially talking with recruitment and employment contacts endlessly.  There is also the matter of a long period of your life, not knowing when money will flow again, without money, seeing your life put on hold.  That has an enormously damaging feeling to one’s psyche. To avoid these issues, even with help, you should do things that reinforce your sense of self-worth. For different people that can mean different things. Spend a portion of each week reinforcing your self-esteem. That will help you in your job search, as nobody wants to hire a loser.

You should also note that the best time to apply for jobs is the first thing in the morning, so that people see your email when they first get in.  If you send out emails on a Sunday or in the afternoon, it will get buried along with other people’s email.  Did you know that applying for a job on a job board merely sends an email to the person that took out the ad?  This restriction puts more pressure on you.

Okay, I suppose that I do not have to tell you, but dress well and dress to impress, even if you are a college graduate.  I do not say that lightly.  I talk from experience.   I was still at college, when I went for my first job interview.  I asked my father how I should dress.  He told me that I am a student and then will see me as such, so I should dress that way.  Not having anyone tell me different, I listened to him.  I was taken aside after the interview and given a talk to by the hiring manager about how to dress.  Needless to say, I did not get that job.  Speaking of learning things through the School of Hard Knocks, and I hold a PhD from that university graduated with high marks, you should listen to criticism and accept it if it is valid, but reject it if you do not feel that it suits you.  People say things to help you, but that does not mean that everything that someone says will help you.  You know yourself best, but do not be prideful and reject good advice.

If you want to dress well and on a budget, I would recommend JC Penney, if you happen to have one in your area.  They have great men’s and women’s professional outfits at great prices that anyone can afford.  I would also check out Nordstrom and Nordstrom Rack.  Sometimes they have last year’s outfits at reduced prices.

When the phone rings and you start talking to someone, if you do not know an answer, do not try to bluff anyone.  That looks bad.  Jot down the question for latter research, but for the moment just say that you do not know.   The worst that can happen is that you blow the conversation, but will learn the question for the next person that calls.  Many company’s do a phone screen at first, so expect that.

More than likely, if you get the job, then you will get the offer within a day, most likely within a short time of the interview.  When interviewers keep interviewing, then they did not like you.  It is as simple as that, although they may interview other people and then get back to you, so you never know.

There is a job for everyone, just as there is that certain someone for everyone.  You have to be persistent and stay in there.  Keep up the education.  If there is a long period of unaccounted for time in your resume, add in short block to account for the period. I would recommend adding in some sort of education.  That can show people that your skills are still relevant.

The first step to finding a job is to stay focused and come up with a plan.  Decide that you will apply to jobs.  Do that like you would any other chore that you do every day.  The most important thing is to not get discouraged and remember that you are a valuable person.  Be creative.

By following these steps, you will see that the phone will start to ring and you will get interviews, both phone and onsite.  From there, it is up to you.  Be positive and smile at the interview.  Do not forget to shake the person’s hand.

Let me know your thoughts.  I would like to hear from you.  You can leave a comment on the blog or by sending an email via the site.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

http://www.jobfish.com
http://blog.jobfish.com

Butterflyvista is the maker of Jobfish 2010, a job search program to help the job seeker find a job. Just as the iPhone revolutionized the smartphone market, Jobfish 2010 is revolutionizing the job search market. From help with your resumes, to working with the job boards, such as Craig’s List, applying for jobs, and so much more, Jobfish 2010 relieves the burdens of the mundane stuff, which usually frustrates job seekers beyond belief. Knowledge and organization is power, and Jobfish gives you both.

Have you heard? Recession is over and 1 interview for 10…

Today’s Los Angeles Times begs for a commentary, sadly not in a positive way.  The problem with a lot of people in the media and in government is that they live in a bubble, separate from other people in the world and the problems they face.    You hear citations of talking with “experts”, economists and government officials of various kinds.  Reading the paper is definitely an exercise in patience.  Who needs yoga, when the media exists.  By the way, with the possible exception of Keith Olbermann on MSNBC.

Have you heard?  The recession ended in June 2009.  You should get at least one interview for every ten resumes that you send out (source today’s Los Angeles Times), and the people that are suffering are those in finance and manufacturing.  There was a third category, but I forget offhand what that was.  Jobs are plentiful, if you live in places like Washington D.C.  The Los Angeles Times blamed the high unemployment on a mismatch of where the jobs are to where people live.  People in California suffer because jobs are plentiful outside of California.

I live in California and am quite familiar with the job situation and the causes here in California, most specifically with the greater Los Angeles.

I was telling a friend of mine today about what the L.A. Times said and my friend’s comment was two things.  One, and he is closer to being right on the first point, is that it takes more like submitting one thousand resumes for every interview unless you are absolutely 100% qualified and your resume gets to the right person and you are the right age and this and that and this and that.  I could hear my mother saying, “and if my grandmother would have a penis, he would be my grandfather.”  Exactly!  I added that one has to be around 28 years old too.  They are the easiest to train, look up to companies as something special, dirt cheap, and will work hard and long hours.  He also likes to talk about the liberal media.  He is a Rush Limbaugh ditto head, Glen Beck too.   He is wrong, obviously, on the second point.

I keep carping on the same points, but they are valid.  First off, engineers and other white collar workers seem be be forgotten.  Secondly, I am familiar with the profession, but before talking about engineering further, I want to digress to tell a story that I heard.

I talked with my sister recently.  She is a medical doctor and her husband works in a hospital.  I was told that up until recently there was a woman, who came by every afternoon, picked up the Dictaphone, and brought back a written transcription the following day.  After years of service,  how do you think that she was rewarded?  Did she get a raise?  Yes, just not the kind that you are thinking about.  She got a quick life from having a foot hand on her butt and tossing her out the door.  She was laid off.  Why?  The hospital could hire a company, in India in this case, at half the cost.

I used to work at Verizon.  Before going on, I will say that I loved that job, the people, and learned a lot.  What is also true is that Verizon was guilty of not outsourcing one job, but virtually the entire engineering effort.  Not only did quite a bit of interaction involve interfacing with the Indian team (numbering in the hundreds from what I could tell), but I would say that over 70% of the people in my building were Indian too working on an H1-B visa.  I was one of only a few non-Indians.  That mix was not good enough.  Verizon decided to close that building and handle the remaining work in Texas, at least until 500 unlucky souls there got the ax.  Verizon was laying people off left and right during my term there.

You may say that Verizon was a special case.  Nope.  My next job was even worse.   Let me just say that the next time you fly on a 787 Dreamliner, you can think of the plane as an outsourced plane.  The trend is getting worse, not better.

Of the companies that I have associated with in one form or another, most believe in outsourcing like many believe in spending $5 (per day) on a cup of coffee at Starbucks.  Some people waste more than $5 per day.  I know of at least two people that fit that bill.

I am not trying to be racist, far from it.  Yes, companies have the right to go where labor is cheap.  I agree with that statement.  They do whatever the law permits.

Before continuing, I talked with a recruiter recently and was told the outsourcing figure.   There are currently about 6 million people working currently in the United States on an H1-B visa.  The government created the H1-B visa program, so that companies could hire talent that was not here in the United States.    The H1-B visa program morphed into a program that does everything but what it was meant to do.

The trouble with engineering and many other industries is not the recession.  The recession is responsible for some job loss, as was the housing bubble burst, but not all jobs.  Manufacturing jobs got outsourced.  “American” car manufacturers build most of their cars outside the United States.  NAFTA is a fancy way of saying take jobs out of the United States.  That was when the problem started.   The problem started with manufacturing and spread to many other industries.

What is my comment about the article that I read that a person should get a minimum of one (1) interview for every ten resumes submitted?   If I were to say horseshit, which was my first thought, I would be saying something bad about horses, and horses are nice creatures, so I will reframe from that thought.  Is there a word to take its place?

As long as I am venting, illegal immigration plays a toll.  I know the Republicans want to score brownie points with their base on this issue, but there are jobs lost in this way.  I was at a well known restaurant chain recently.   They definitely hire knowingly illegal immigrants.  One bragged to me that he came here illegally from El Salvador and makes $10 per hour.  He holds two jobs.  No, I am not making that up, and God alone only knows why he told me or was bragging to me on the topic.  Common sense would say that he would be quite as a church mouse on this topic.  Is he the only one, nope.  I feel for his story, but the truth is that he is taking away a job from an American.  Okay, illegal immigrants is a small percentage of the problem and outsourcing the white elephant, but even so.

Our former president said that migrant workers (that seems to whitewash the real phrase, no?) take on the jobs that no one else wants to.  Okay, I still do not know of a word to replace horseshit, because that comes to mind.  The truth is that there is no one that wants to work like a slave for $2 per hour in the fields or $10 per hour serving soup or warming potatoes for guests on Sundays.  I agree with that.  What would happen if we increased the wage to $25 in the field and in the restaurants?

What would happen if Congress got some Cojones and imposed a tax on H1-B visa and outsourcing, ff a company wants to outsource work, it would have to pay a tax of 20% plus 1.5 times the amount of money lost than if the jobs were done here?  What would happen if a company had to pay $2 million tax per year for every H1-B applicant .

The cost of goods would go up (guess what folks, they do anyways), but at least everyone that wanted a job would have a job.  They would be able to pay for goods.

Just to address one other point that I keep reading about in the papers and is so total whatever the word I should use (thoughts?).  “We are in a deflationary time, blah blah blah.”

Supercuts charges $2 more now than a few months ago, which is $2 more now than last year.  Restaurants charge significantly more now than in the past.  I am thinking of a certain national American Italian chain that doubled their prices in about a two to three year span.  Rents have gone up.  Groceries have absolutely gone up and not by a little bit.  Gasoline has skyrocketed.  Airline ticket prices have gone up.  We live in a radically inflationary time, just people do not complain and the media and government ignores the facts.

Another sticking point, as long as I am bitching, is a certain bank agreeing to stop foreclosures.  How about landlords agreeing not to collect rent and the courts agreeing not to hear any cases of tenants not paying rent, hence no evictions.  Did I make my point?  I am not being heartless either, far from it.  Housing costs had exponential inflation, not because people wanted a home, but because people wanted to become rich off of it, flip properties so to speak.  Yes, there are those that really did get hurt, but a lot more that played the game and should pay the price like the rest of us.

I totally get ticked off hearing that unemployment is bad and that people who receive it have a disinterest in finding real work.  That is the Republican mantra.   I am not even being biased.  They really say that and a lot.  I hear this view much more so than how most people in the GOP are against abortions and “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”  Every other speech this year seems to evoke how benefits should be cut and how employees are lazy.  Are you?

Finding work is a tough lonely job under  any circumstances and especially if you are out of work for long periods of time.  They are not lazy and really do work.  I cannot give work to people and nor can I pass legislation, but maybe in my own small way, I can help by creating a program that really does help job seekers get a job.  I wrote Jobfish, because there was no tool that truly helped job seekers.  There was no company that listened to their needs.  Butterflyvista has tried to live up to the ideal to help people.  It was written by a job seeker, who knows from experience what is required.  Jobfish has grown a lot this year by listening to all of you and incorporating many of the comments.  Butterflyvista in the future will continue to do the same.

I hope that with these blogs that there will be a discussion started and a groundswell building so that jobs really do come back and not just temporarily and at the expense of someone else.  Politics and jobs are interconnected; they always have been.  Fixing the economy takes time.  Fixing anything takes time, but breaking it is quick.

Do let us know your comments on Jobfish.   We uploaded training videos to YouTube recently for anyone that feels a bit lost.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

Memories of Saint Landon

Unless I am mistaken, I think that I am the first to anoint the omnipotent Michael Landon as Saint.  After watching an episode last night of Little House, originally written for Bonanza, I thought of two things.  One, Michael Landon solves every problem large and small.  He can raise people from the almost / virtually dead (He Was Only Twelve with James), make drunks sober (Someone Please Love Me), and make the blind to see (not Mary, but someone else).  My thought was how many of us now with papers writing of a new and larger destitute class living at or below the poverty line would like a Michael Landon (aka Jonathan or Charles) riding up obviously not in a horse to solve our problems.  After all, if he can do all that, then why can he not help the vast amount of people who are unemployed?

The other thought that I had, and the reason why I am writing this blog entry, is that how little (and much) things have changed and how people do not like change.  It takes an act of God, or at least Landon :-), to get people to move.   I was in college and taking a history class.  On the final exam was one question that stood out.  I  do not recall if that was the only question on the final exam, but it was definitely the most memorable one.  “Do people like change, why or why not?”   We had to use historical context to back up our answer.  I naturally said that people absolutely like change, especially if it is for the good.  Ah, the arrogance of youth.  I am not saying that I am old now, but I was younger than.   People do not like change, even when they want it.

The world is full of examples.  People tine and time again like the status quo.  I can think of women that get beaten and stay, because that is what they know, to Congress perpetually moving at a snails pace with Global Warming and other issues.  Even people who want a job, clutch on to what they know, hence the tie-in to Jobfish.  There is one exception, Steven Jobs of Apple.

Okay, he lost his magic with Apple TV, but judgment is still out on that one.  Okay, he gets a pass, because the studios will not allow him to sell shows for 99 cents.  I do not want to get off topic, but seriously have you ever seen anyone else talk virtually an entire planet to change their ways and pay a nice chunk of money for it?  The MP3 and cell phone markets were saturated.   A trip to Fry’s before the iPod offered dozens of nearly free to free MP3 players.  That was before Jobs came along and decided that people should pay multiple hundreds of dollars every other year for it.

My father was the last person on the planet that I thought would ever get an iPhone, but he did.  He proudly showed it off to me.  I do not even have one.   Yes, Steve Jobs is the exception to the rule that people do not like change.

With respect to the job market, people clutch to what they know.  They ask their friends, write notes, open up multiple tabs in a browser, or just use Microsoft Excel, maybe even just Notepad.  Post-It Notes work great too.

Just as the iPhone showed that there is a better way, the same holds true for finding a job.  Face it, with the possible exception of Craig’s List, but even there, the interest of job boards and staffing firms (recruiters) are with employers, not the employee.

Did you watch the episode of Medium last year, when Joe lost his job and contacted a recruiter, who worked tirelessly on his behalf, for free, to get him a new, and then ideal, job as an engineer?   If Michael Landon and Gene Roddenberry (society without money, etc. and definitely etc.) stretched reality, then Medium definitely did.  Staffing firms are simply not like that.  They just are not.  The same holds true for job boards.  Yes, there are a few people, who can always get a job by calling a couple of old colleagues or asking their friends.  I talked with someone the other day for which that was true.   I think that I can say for the most of us that that sentiment is not true.

Can there be such a thing as a savior for the average job seeker?  Okay, I am thinking of a Little Joe Cartwright or Bobby Ewing (think Dallas)?  From what I see, the answer is no.  The Los Angeles Times and other periodicals keep writing horror stories.  I read of one family that had to separate with the father living somewhere else and the mother and children living with her parents, because neither of them could find jobs.

There is one thing that I have noticed that always is in common.  The one out of work woman in Philadelphia sent out 200 resumes in the past twelve months and was not able to find a job.  Virtually every article, if not every article, which talks of people’s hardships, mentions that they sent out somewhere around 200 resumes in a year and could not find a job.

How about sending out 200 resumes in about three hours, give or take an hour?  How about doing that each and every single day?  What do you think the odds would be if the number increased radically?  What would happen if records were suddenly kept.  Information when someone calls would be available at an instant?  What if working with job boards did not require David Carradine’s Kung Fu character, Kwai Chang Caine, but rather maybe not became fun, but at least not bad.  What about if tweaking resumes, getting tips on interviews, looking at job metrics, and even having a better way to use Craig’s List were available?  It is with Jobfish.

What do you think of a major newspaper comparison with the subject line “Which is more stylish and has better lines, Apple’s iPhone 4 or Jobfish!”  Okay, there is something to be said for the styling of the Blackberry Torch, but if you ask me, the lines of Jobfish are a bit better. 😉

I wanted to give a bit more detail on Craig’s List.  The way that Craig’s List works is that you click on the email link, respond to the person who placed the ad, and wait for an email back.  How many times have you received an email back and not known which advertisement that the article pertained to?  Yeah, there might be a link, but usually not.  Jobfish not only makes responding to Craig’s List job postings a snap, by automating the entire process, but Jobfish also places a copy of the posting at the bottom of the email.  In that way, when you get a response back, you have the entire job posting at the bottom of the email for easy viewing.  That puts you one step up, as you can talk intelligently.  Information is power, and so to is Jobfish.

My last comment for this entry is sadly religious institutions and the people inside them for the most part, or at least from my own experience, will talk of helping people in far off lands, but do nothing for the people in their own congregation, who are suffering.  Reverend Aldan in Little House, as the people of Walnut Grove, bent over backwards to help a fellow person struggling get back on their feat.  Religious institutions will not even let you in their doors, if you do not pay them.

Jobfish is here to help you, as are the people here at Butterflyvista.  Let us help you with your job search.  Write us with your stories.  Share your thoughts.  With new dynamics in the job market, finding a job is tougher than in the past.  There can be help Little House style.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

The Democrats are Always Wrong

A political commentary by Sarah Weinberger
This picture shows the perception of the Democrat Party with the Republican Party never doing any wrong.

Hello everyone!  I am finally writing my first post on this blog.  I have been meaning to start my political blog for years, but never got around to it.  Finally, I got a push recently, when I had to start another business related blog.  Hopefully my writings will get read and maybe help society.

I mentioned to my father this past week, why is it that Republicans can never do any wrong and the few times that they do, they just have to wait a year or two, blame the Democrats for their mistakes (deficits, unemployment, The Great Recession (although Bill Clinton was party responsible for it, as he repealed the Glass Stevens act), and other ills and then wait a couple of years, and then they are primed to be the saviors once again.  The cries of deficit reduction and how bad the Democrats are for wanting to give unemployment benefits to the middle class are the latest example.  What is shocking is that people keep buying what they are selling.  Do people really expect the Democrats to magically turn things around overnight?

Maybe the Democrats could but they are up against an obstructionist Republic machine.  They filibuster everything.  When the Democrats a few years ago even contemplated using it even once, the Republicans in power said that they would use the “Nuclear Option” and talked loud and often that everything should go up for a vote and how bad they are.

That brings to mind the two rightwing Christian coalition puppets that the George W. Bush regime wanted to install into the Supreme Court.  When the Democrats talked about a filibuster, the Republicans, who happened to have a majority, said “thumbs up or down.” They said that Democrats were obstructionists because the fair thing is to give them a thumbs up or down vote knowing full well that they had the majority of votes meaning a confirmation.  They seriously must have amnesia, because now everything is filibustered and they repeatedly said that if they do not like a candidate that President Barack Obama picks that they will use the filibuster, on ones that they cannot.  What happened to their principled view of “thumbs up or down vote”?  Does principle go out?  Are they not the party of principles and the righteous party?

What they are is the party of the one-liner slogans, homophobic, transphobic, and hypocritical people.  They talk endlessly about flip flopping.  A recent ad talks about how Jerry Brown reinvents himself every few years.  I would phrase that as learning from past mistakes and reevaluating things, which in the case of Jerry Brown is accurate.  He is a serious student and questions himself.  Barack Obama is the same.

John McCain is a flip flopper and an angry old man, as a recent article in Newsweek said about him.  Rather than stand up for principles (ending don’t ask don’t tell), he flip flops and wants to be part of the party’s establishment, a position that he talked endlessly that he was not part of.

The Republicans talk about being the party of Lincoln, but Lincoln gave a voice to those that could not speak.  Reagan in some sense was the same.  He voted to give women the right to choose, even though he felt the opposite.  Throughout history the rights of the minority is not something put to public vote.  Shall we put all African Americans back to slavery?  The population as a whole felt that they were second class citizens back then.  The rights of the LGBT community today is no different, but I do not even have to go there.  The Republicans are against small business, the poor, middle class, and anything else that does not believe in their purity message.  That sounds more like a Nazi message than anything else.  Okay, I am thinking of the Nazis now probably because the Tea Party is in the news about that the past few days.

I talked with a friend this evening and the comment of the night was that the two senators from Maine should be thrown out of office, because they are not pure and not Republicans.  This whole thought goes into another thought that I had this evening, namely that quite a few people in our society do not want intellectuals and people who have experience.  Nerds are not welcome.  People with experience are not welcome.  What is welcome are people with no experience and one-liners.  Yes and sadly, this statement applies to Democrats as well.

Before sidetracking myself onto a different thesis, I should finish up the first one.   Why is it that Republicans can never do any wrong?  Why is it that only Republicans can be obstructionists, a term used freely by the Republicans against the Democrats, when it is them.  Most people in society does not regard them as such and if so, not for long.

It is hard not bringing DADT into the thread.  The United States prides itself at being in the right always and being at the cutting edge of human rights, but these days we are behind most of the world.  Even England is ahead of us.  Heck, Spain and other countries are too.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

How about changing the text a bit and substituting “heterosexual White Anglo Saxons males” instead of people.  African Americans should be either shot or made slaves.  Jews should be exterminated.  Hispanics should be made whatever happens to them.  Native Americans, those who have not been killed or assimilated, should be killed (finish the job, final solution?).  Transsexuals should have corrective therapy.  By the way, that really does happen, mostly in Canada these days.  I was reading about it, sadly.  It infuriated me to say the least.  Gays should be put in prison and have corrective therapy done on them.  Homosexuality is a disease.  Maybe transsexuals and gays really do have something in common.  Hmm.  Both have diseases that can be given to the others and both are not human and definitely do not have the same rights as everyone else.

I was writing about the LGBT, but my mind kept thinking of Native Americans.  I never heard the phrase, “Final Solution” (a Nazi term) and Native Americans used in the same sentence, but the United States in its infancy pretty much did the same thing that the Germans did.  I never connected the dots.  We were no different.  Yes, we are better today, but no sitting United States President has ever apologized.  I know that one president a few years back apologized for the Japanese internment during WWII, but I do not think the Indians.  Americans, even then, were different on at least two fronts.  The Americans never rounded up and killed the Native Americans in secret telling society something different.  They were also never gassed.  There was also no government santioned extermination program.  The list goes on, so there are vast differences.  That being said, we as Americans had and have our dark side.

All people are equal.  All people are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.

The original 13 colonies separated from England, so that they could practice their religion as they saw fit and that England could not enter people’s bedrooms.  “A man’s home is his castle.”  There is a reason for that idiom and it goes to the founding of our country.  How ironic it is then that we do not practice our own ideals.

I was just thinking that my various thoughts are not connected, but in one sense they are.  Most Republicans are anti-people.  They are definitely anti-military, how ironic is that?  They are anti middle class.  They are hypocrites for crying about deficits for extending unemployment, when they spend money freely and easily.  They expanded government like no one else.  Even their beloved Reagan did.   George W. Bush definitely did too.  I think that I have to take back my statement that he was stupid.  He was many things, but stupid was not one of them, another blog entry.  Heck, the first eight years of this century deserves a book.

I do not want to say that Democrats are saints.  That is so far from the truth, but why is it that people do not see the current Republican Party for who they are?  In case you are thinking that I am a bleeding heart liberal, you are wrong.   There have been many good Republicans, but the Republican Party of today is not the Republican Party of years ago.  They are made up now of Southern Democrats, who left the Democratic Party, because they did not like Civil Rights.  That infused with hard shift to supporting the Christian Coalition and the extreme religious right.  Just look at their spokesmen now: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and all the other homophobic hate spewing talking heads.

Republicans of today would never elect Nixon or Reagan, let alone Eisenhower.  I would not mind that Barack Obama develop some balls and take a side.  He always tries to appease both sides.  That is his trademark style.

The Democrats will probably hold onto power this November, but it would be nice if society as a whole can start doing the right things.  We do slowly but surely, but it would be nice sooner than later.

I still would like to know why Republicans seemingly can do no wrong.  By the way, I disagree that Americans are right of center. 🙂

Sarah M. Weinberger

Obama: Economic Team verses Polling Team

Comments: if you would like to post a comment, please help me identify you as not a spammer by not filling in the URL portion.  Also, please be specific and mention words and phrases from what I wrote.  Do not write things that say just “Great site” and “Good job” along with some sort of name and a URL.  I will treat those as spam.  Sorry, but it is not always easy to distinguish spam from not spam.

I was reading last a recent issue of Newsweek, staff writer Ezra Klein writes an article entitled “It’s Always the Economy, Stupid”.”  He talks about how elections are not decided based upon the candidate, but rather on the economical situation of the country as a whole.  The author even cited major Presidential wins such as Reagan and Nixon over McGovern as holding up to the model.  The author’s other main point is that in the Obama administration there are two competing thoughts.  The first is the economics team, which wants to push the economy with a second stimulus.  A second stimulus, as the author noted, is meaningless to help for the November elections coming up.  The other is polling team, which wants to focus on deficits.  The thesis was that Obama can do neither, and should therefore focus on governing.

I do not disagree with what he says.  It is too late for an economic stimulus package to do much.   Pushing through the unemployment package tomorrow is necessary, but that goes into good governess.  What Mr. Klein misses is that there is a third way.  Providing a stimulus package does not help white collar workers.  Heck, the government  cannot even get NASA properly funded and focused.  The Venture Star, the true successor to the space shuttle was killed by George W. Bush as too costly.  NASA has become risk adverse.  Sorry, NASA, but space is a risky proposition.  That being said, it can be done safer.  President Obama killed the Constellation program, a scaled back effort and more risk adverse project, of going back to the moon and providing launch capability to the International Space Station.  The government has no interest in funding white collar.  When the government talks of stimulus, what they really talk about is blue collar projects.  That is not a bad thing.  We desperately need roads.  I would love to see a second deck on I-405 and I-101.  I would like to see I-10 widened to accommodate more lanes.  That would help white collar workers, as traffic would not be so bad, thereby enabling longer commutes, which give greater job opportunities.

What the Obama Administration does not understand is a basic economic principle taught in high school, namely the closed cycle of capitalism.  Person A spends money somewhere giving it to company A.  Company B in turn spends money on products and services, which eventually gives Person A back the money spent on the initial transaction.  The system falls apart, when money flows out of the closed circle, such as occurs when people work here and send money abroad without that country sending money back here.  The circular system fails, when companies are allowed to outsource or hire people on an HI-B visa without that company having to pay society back.  Maybe two million dollars is not unreasonable a fee, as a friend of mine suggested, if that amount goes to fund programs that give workers jobs, such as a revitalized NASA (or other programs that help and further society).  Obama can pass laws today that make global economics fairer.  I am not suggesting going back to an isolationist society, such as after World War I, when Woodrow Wilson and his League of Nations (United Nations predecessor).  Global economics has done wonders for everyone including the United States.  That does not mean that laws cannot be passed to make things fairer.

After all, what is fair about applying for a job, when you are competing with Indians in India?  I worked at an aerospace company in Burbank (although I could have mentioned a major telecommunications company here in the Westside), where the majority of engineers (think 80%) are either H1-B or a division / outsourced company in India.  Do not think of one or two people that have special skills.  In each case, think of hundreds to thousands of workers.  Between these two companies we are talking conservatively about two thousand people at a minimum, but more likely than not is a lot more.  If we multiply that number by some factor taking into account the number of companies here in the United States and we are now talking tens of millions of jobs.  For every so many engineers, there are project managers, graphic artists, managers, secretaries, cleaning crews, and other employees that are necessary to support them.

How many people are now unemployed (rhetorical question)?  If you now subtract out these tens of millions from the laid off tens of millions and you would have a work shortage.  Let us take 20 million people.  If 20 million people were suddenly employed here in the United States and making a decent wage ($50,00 and up but more like $100,000).  If we deduct the usual city, state, government, Medicare, and Social Security taxes, we would no longer be talking of deficits and increased taxes but rather surpluses.

Regardless of how the economy does, employees need a tool that can help them.  I was told recently that I created Jobfish, because of the difficulty in finding a job during The Great Recession.  That is totally inaccurate.  I started Jobfish back in 2002 right at the beginning of the Dot Com bust.  At the time, I lost my job and then got another.  True the Dot Com bust was the impetus, but I was thinking about the product even before during the best of times.  Why?

There are tools a-plenty for employers and recruiters.  Companies are bending over backwards for them.  There are no tools for the job seeker.  Do not tell me job boards (i.e. Career Builder, Dice, Monster, Craig’s List, and one of my favorites Indeed).  Each one of them is annoying to use.  I can only look at them so much before getting frustrated.  Talking with recruiters is also annoying.  Keeping things straight is also annoying.

I often thought that I would like my own personal matchmaker, but for jobs.  I have talked to a couple Executive Recruiters, which want $5,000 for their services, but who has that kind of money to spend.  Most of the ones that I have dealt with seem like sharks trying to extort money from the desperate.  I could go on and on about what I think about Executive Recruiters, but even if one hires someone for this task, that person will still need tools, because then they become the job seeker.  You are just employing to do the dirty work for you.

No matter what the economic climate, job seekers need a tool that can help them, good economy or not.  I understand what it means to be unemployed.  I understand the tools that one would need.  I understand the frustrations.  I understand all too well the misery and desperate feelings that one helps when one is unemployed.

Before wrapping up, I want to address a comment that I hear again and again, namely that I cannot afford Jobfish.  That is such horseshit.  That really is.  That is the wrong attitude too.  Can you afford to be unemployed month after month?  Can you afford to be tied down to a computer all day, when you could go get another job?  Most people still go out to eat or see a movie, unless one is really desperate.  People should be happy that a tool like Jobfish exists and want to support it.  The alternative is that there is no Jobfish.

People are so focused on the status quo that they forget that there can be an easier way.  I heard from a the leader of a job club on the East Coast recently.  This person was skeptical and gave the usual song and dance.  Seriously, I keep hearing the same story.  Thankfully, this person agreed to give Jobfish a try.  From getting no callbacks in a year, within a week this person started to receive phone calls (plural).  This person could also apply for many multiples of the number of jobs that this person previously could at a fraction of the time.  I also heard about the frustration level being greatly reduced.  That was why I created Jobfish, because these issues are timeless and there should be a tool that helps job seekers and contractors looking for new clients.

Give Jobfish a try.  Go to www.jobfish.com today.  Let me know what you think of Jobfish.  As James T. Kirk said in the original Star Trek series, The City on the Edge of Forever, let us help you.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

Unemployment, the Recession, and the Media

I guess by writing a blog on this topic the mere posting of my thoughts makes me part of the media, albeit with currently a very small readership and no national magazine presence, but then even Fareed Zakaria started somewhere.

Still everywhere I read, I just get frustrated, although there are some bright spots.  Andy Grove, a Hungarian who emigrated to the United States in 1956 and cofounded Intel, yes that Andy Grove, wrote an article in a recent issue of Business Week, now Bloomberg Business Week.  Sadly, like Google News, the new incarnation got worse.  Andy Grove talked about the same issues that I did, namely that employers do hire, but just not here in the United States.  Outsourcing is the real issue.  To that, I would add in H1-B Visas, illegal immigration, and the wrongful use of free trade agreements (NAFTA for one).

Business Week in their current issue wrote about Ford and Chrysler about to repay the loans that US taxpayers made to both companies.  Both companies are expanding their hiring, but not here in the United States.  Both are opening plants in Mexico, because they can pay daily salaries of less than $27, whereas here in the United States they would have to pay salaries of $56 per hour, a significant increase.   There is a bright side in that jobs in Mexico keep illegal immigrants there.

Business Week also wrote about our trade imbalance with China.  The power brokers were optimistic, when China said that they would increase the value of the Yuan recently.  I could have told them that the increase would be a token amount.  Most of the media said the same thing.  I read the article, which talks of how the United States could punish China with tariffs and the like.  People always like to deal with symptoms of the problem and not the actual problem.  China is not the real problem.  They are not innocent and squeaky clean, but they are not the problem.  We are.

Why?  American companies and investors pore money into the country taking jobs and money there.  We do the same to other countries.  I am a fool blooded capitalist.  I believe in capitalism.  I do like Star Trek and believe in the ideals expressed therein, but a society without money would not work.  Anyone who studies economics in high school (I took a small form of it), will tell you that the economics of capitalism rely on the principle of a closed loop system.  Someone gives money to someone else for goods or service.  That someone will then take that money and spend on goods or service, thereby giving the money back to the first person.

Outsourcing of jobs takes away from that model.  Money flows out, but does not flow back.  A solution would be to tax companies, not China, for outsourcing.  They can outsource, but only as at a cost to them.  Hire someone from outside, but you will pay.

Oh, I am talking of China only because Business Week and other publications that I read this weekend talked about the country, but I could have picked on the Middle East and other countries, where our dollars go, but come back in limited ways.  I do not see Saudi Arabia or Iran buying as much goods or services from American companies than we do them.  I should clarify, non-outsourcing companies.  I tend to consider Ford foreign.  They are based here in the United States, but what counts is not.

The new labor statistics came out on Friday.  Hiring is down, as the stimulus hiring winds down and the temporary census workers are laid off.  Both parties blame the other for the continued recession.  It was mostly temporary jobs and blue collar that got those temporary jobs.  White collar, especially engineering did not.

Business Week also talked about lending to small business, one of the purposes of the stimulus package, did not happen.  Small banks were not secure and as such did not lend.  Conventional Wisdom dictates that small business, not big business, typically leads the country out of a recession. Washington listens to people who have never suffered.  One economist gaining popularity within conservatives (in an article about Greece), points out that fiscal restraint and conservatism (read here hurting the poor and making them tighten their belts) helps a country get out of the recession, because investors gain confidence that the worst is at hand and that things will only get better.  Seriously, this concept is delusional thinking callous at best.

The point remains.  For every job opening there are many applicants.  I wonder how many applicants do not even apply, because they gave up.  What does giving up mean?  Does that mean a suicide?

Jobfish cannot give you a job.  Jobfish is not a job creator.  Jobfish can, however, alleviate much of the frustration of seeking gainful employment.  I know.  You may think that you do not need Jobfish, but Excel just does not cut it.  From resume package handling, to job board management, to everything else, you owe it to yourself to check out Jobfish.

  • Let Jobfish present job search results for you in a manner that lets you examine that quickly and easily.
  • Let Jobfish help you apply to jobs and keep track of them.
  • Let Jobfish create multiple personal resume packages, whose cover letter you can tweak on boards supporting email applications.
  • Let Jobfish attach notes to a particular job posting.
  • Quickly recall job postings, when a recruiter or employer calls using Jobfish?
  • The list goes on and on.  Download Jobfish today!

 

What have you got to lose?

Check out our videos on our site, www.jobfish.com.

Sarah M. Weinberger
Butterflyvista Corporation

Jobfish 2010 vs. Excel – Not a Fair Fight

While conventional thinking leads many job seekers to manage their search with the same tools they used in college or while employed, programs like Excel do not make the most sense in today’s economy.

Clicking links, pasting them in Excel, manually entering contact and adjusting columns may feel “comfortable” out of pure familiarity, but with so many people about to lose unemployment benefits, there’s little room for comfort anymore.

We created Jobfish 2010 so you can apply more quickly and accurately to job openings and manage each application faster and easier than possible in Excel.

Here are 5 ways Jobfish 2010 and Excel stack up head-to-head:

Searching Job Boards

Jobfish 2010 – Allows you to quickly organize job postings into one grid, and saves job descriptions statically – which means that each job description will be remain in your Jobfish program long after Craigslist removes the link.

Excel – No search option; you must open lots of windows and download links individually to another program.

Contacting Recruiters

Jobfish 2010 – Once you import a job posting into your Jobfish database, Jobfish will search automatically for any email address contained in the job posting or in the HTML source for you.  There may still be a “Dear Sir or Madam” required, but Jobfish will create the email for the user automatically.

Excel – Can’t search for anything outside the database you create

Data Entry

Jobfish 2010 – Click and download, takes seconds and also saves job descriptions

Excel – Hope you really like to type and adjust columns

Cover Letters

Jobfish 2010 – Quickly customize dozens of pre-loaded letters

Excel – Exit program to find old saved documents in Word…that have to be saved again

Avoiding Disasters

Jobfish 2010 – Resume package feature prevents attaching the wrong resume by accident

Excel – Doesn’t store resumes; must open word and read every bullet point to see which one applies.

Butterflyvista Corporation